About
Profile facts
Key Averages
Average Likes
—
avg / selected range
Average Comments
—
avg / selected range
Average Posts
—
avg / selected range
Comments / 100 Likes
—
avg / selected range
Average Engagement Rate
—
avg / selected range
Likes Stats
Comments Stats
Posts Stats
Comments Ratio (per 100 likes)
Engagement Rate
Followers Prediction
New Daily Followers
Followers Growth Rate (vs Peers)
—
–
Compared to cohort P50 (90d)
Engagement Rate (vs Peers)
—
–
Compared to cohort P50
Avg Likes (Comparable)
—
–
Compared to 180d median (peer data unavailable)
Avg Comments (Comparable)
—
–
Compared to 180d median (peer data unavailable)
Comments Ratio (Comparable)
—
–
Compared to 180d median (peer data unavailable)
Dr Michelle Wong - Beauty Science
Instagram Profile
Performance
View details
Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science’s Instagram is projected to grow by - / day
Projection based on recent performance trends.
New report. Limited history.
Followers Graph
Register for FREE email alerts on sudden spikes or drops in followers for Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science.
- Real-time alerts
- Growth insights
- No card required
Watchlist updated.
Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science — Instagram Follower Projections
Projected growth from past data. Actuals may vary with trends or algorithm shifts.
659K Followers
2K Posts
- Followers / Day
- Posts / Day
| Time Until | Date | Followers | Posts | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Live | 659,346 | 2,243 | — | |
| Not enough data. | ||||
Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science has an Instagram engagement rate of 0.51%
Share this engagement stat
Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science Historical Stats
Latest 15 entries. Daily follower gains and drops.
Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science can charge up to $200 USD per Instagram post.
Typical range: $40 – $200 USDShare earning estimate
Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science’s Influence Rate
Export CSVDr Michelle Wong Beauty Science shows an influence rate of 0.51%, suggesting a reach of ~3.2K per post.
Followers
659K
Posts
2K
Engagement
0.51%
Avg. Likes
3.2K
-
Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science (@labmuffinbeautyscience) — 659K FollowersEngagement: 0.51% · Avg. Likes: 3.2K · Avg. Comments: 133
%s’s Influence Rate
FAQ – Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science Instagram Stats
Common questions about Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science’s Instagram analytics.
Answer: Chem PhD | cosmetic science | sci-ed 🇦🇺
👇 New video: Debunking fake "expert" beauty advice
👇 Free Exfoliation Guide
Answer: Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science has 659,346 followers on Instagram.
Answer: Engagement rate of Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science's Instagram Account is 0.51%.
Answer: Average likes are about 3,219 per Instagram post.
Answer: Average comments are about 133 per post.
Answer: Instagram Id of Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science is @labmuffinbeautyscience.
Answer: Worth of an Instagram post on Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science’s profile is $10 USD - $200 USD.
Answer: Dr Michelle Wong Beauty Science discusses Beauty, Skincare, Science on their Instagram.Top captions from recent popular posts:
- More things I wish people knew about sunscreen: Yes, you can use chemical sunscreens while pregnant SPF is NOT just UVB protection - blocking all UVB and no UVA only gives SPF 11 UVB contributes more to premature ageing than UVA (stop saying "A for Ageing, B for Burning" pls) UVA levels are nowhere near constant over a day or a year, it just varies a bit less than UVB Mineral sunscreens mostly absorb UV and convertit to heat, just like chemical sunscreens. Only 5-10% is reflected/scattered (and that's not "better" in any way) A lot of your "2 fingers" of sunscreen are WAY TOO THIN, scrape them into a 1/4 teaspoon measure to check Layering sun protection methods is best (sunscreen, hats, clothing, shade, sunglasses) Mineral sunscreens still need to be reapplied #spf #sunscreen #skincare #skinstagram
- No, there aren't microplastics in most of your sunscreens, or other beauty products. Beat the Microbead uses an extremely loose definition for microplastics that includes all synthetic polymers, even those that are very much NOT plastic. And if you're selling sunscreen like Kelly Slater, you might want to, uh, ✨do your own research✨ A much bigger source of microplastics is the packaging. But even then, microplastics have been massively exaggerated as an environmental concern. This is largely because of the natural = safer fallacy, and a lot of greenwashing in marketing. As consumers, we tend to focus on end-of-life, so it's very easy for companies to greenwash with "plastic-free" claims. But a lot of environmental impact happens before you finish using the product - plastics are often a more sustainable packaging option when the whole life cycle is considered. I highly recommend following theecowell for solid sustainability info, and some great posts on microplastics and Beat the Microbead! Shoutout to drjessicaknurick for sending this post to me - another great person to follow especially for nutrition insights 🤓 #spf #microplastics #skincarescience #sunscreenmyths #sunscreen
- Clarifying my earlier reel on the Choice SPF tests and Ultra Violette Lean Screen's low result, some more reflections on what went wrong, and which sunscreens to set aside for now - see my story highlights (in my profile) for the full collection! Who would've thought so many of my favourite topics (sunscreen, scientific fraud, authority bias, fake experts, systemic drivers of misinformation) would all come together in such an unholy mess? 👀 #spf #sunscreen #mythbusting #skincare #skincarescience